<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steve Speak &#187; Tid-Bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/category/tid-bits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog</link>
	<description>A brief journey into the mind of Steve (... from a safe distance, of course!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Have to see it to believe it &#8211; Soap Nuts!</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/06/15/have-to-see-it-to-believe-it-soap-nuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/06/15/have-to-see-it-to-believe-it-soap-nuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laundry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soap nuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming off of Canadian Environment Week (June 5-11th) and World Environment Day (June 5th) I thought I would share one of our latest environmental discoveries. I often find myself a bit under-whelmed with some of ‘natural’ or environmentally friendly solutions &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/06/15/have-to-see-it-to-believe-it-soap-nuts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 15px 4px 0;">
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 250px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sophistechate/3015591720/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3245/3015591720_17dfe85f83_m.jpg" alt="Just a bag of nuts" width="240" height="161" class="alignnone" /></a>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sophistechate/3015591720/">Just a bag of nuts</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sophistechate/">Lisa Brewster</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Coming off of Canadian Environment Week (June 5-11th) and World Environment Day (June 5th) I thought I would share one of our latest environmental discoveries.</p>
<p>I often find myself a bit under-whelmed with some of ‘natural’ or environmentally friendly solutions I read about or test out. I suppose this makes sense, as some chemical cocktail designed for a specific cleaning purpose will probably beat something which just kind of works in that regard. If these solutions do work, they often require more work and elbow-grease. Both of these trade-offs are worth it, though, in many cases to lessen our environmental impact.<span id="more-134"></span></p>
<p>My wife discovered these things called ‘soap nuts’ and decided to order a sample kit to give them a try. I was fairly skeptical, but figured why not give it a try. Was I ever wrong in my skepticism on this one!</p>
<p>Soap nuts (or <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapindus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapindus" target="_blank">Sapindus</a>) are a kind of berry or fruit which grow on trees and are in the Lychee family. I think the variety we received grow in India. Apparently, they have been used for thousands of years for washing things.</p>
<p>Wash things they do! Since our son was born, we have switched to scent-free types of laundry detergents. Some work better than others, but often they don’t completely remove every scent from the clothing. Since they lack the perfumes to mask what they do leave behind, the clothes never smell 100% fresh and clean. The soap nuts, on the other hand, leave our laundry smelling about as fresh and neutral as anything we have ever used. The results are astonishing!</p>
<p>Even better, they are less work than using laundry detergent. You simply put 4 or 5 of the nuts in a cloth bag with a draw string, and toss it in the washing machine. You can do approximately 1 load per nut, so you just run this bag in 4-5 loads of laundry, and then simply discard the nuts and put some fresh ones in. The soap nuts are even compostable. No sticky cups of detergent to pour in or sticky puddles of detergent on the washer top to clean up. Super simple, super results!</p>
<p>You can also buy these things in bulk if you search around the Internet a bit, which actually brings the cost per load under what one typical pays for descent laundry detergent. It is a win-win-win in every way I can see. Check them out!</p>
<p>Also, as some of you know, I write for my <a title="http://www.tilledsoil.org/about/" href="http://www.tilledsoil.org/about/" target="_blank">Christian apologetics ministry</a> over at <a title="http://www.tilledsoil.org/" href="http://www.tilledsoil.org/" target="_blank">TilledSoil.org</a>. Since we are Christians, we want to care for creation and this fits well into that goal. I will be posting a more general article on Christianity and Environmentalism in the next day or two. Please keep an eye out for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/06/15/have-to-see-it-to-believe-it-soap-nuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell Gizmo5, No Thanks Google Voice, Hello Callcentric!</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/03/16/farewell-gizmo5-no-thanks-google-voice-hello-callcentric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/03/16/farewell-gizmo5-no-thanks-google-voice-hello-callcentric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Callcentric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gizmo5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, this is a bit of a rant, but might also help out some stranded Gizmo5 clients. A couple weeks back, I received an e-mail that Gizmo5 services were being shut-down, and that I would have to transition my account &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/03/16/farewell-gizmo5-no-thanks-google-voice-hello-callcentric/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 15px 4px 0;">
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 250px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nano/166357227/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/70/166357227_54f7ab817c_m.jpg" alt="Ubuntu 6.06 LTS + Gizmo Project 0.8aplha(v6)" width="240" height="180" class="alignnone" /></a>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nano/166357227/">Ubuntu 6.06 LTS + Gizmo Project 0.8aplha(v6)</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nano/">Nano Taboada</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Ok, this is a bit of a rant, but might also help out some stranded Gizmo5 clients.</p>
<p>A couple weeks back, I received an e-mail that <a title="http://www.google.com/gizmo5/" href="http://www.google.com/gizmo5/" target="_blank">Gizmo5</a> services were being shut-down, and that I would have to transition my account to Google Voice, or get a refund on any remaining credit. I was expecting this to happen eventually after Gizmo5 was bought-out by Google, but was a bit surprised at the quick time-frame once announced (about a month). <span id="more-129"></span>I&#8217;m pretty busy right now finishing up my graduate degree, so I really didn&#8217;t want this on my plate as well. However, I really had no choice, or we would have lost our phone numbers and been out of business on our phone service.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using VoIP phone service since around 2005 when <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmo5" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmo5" target="_blank">Gizmo Project</a> first got going. We&#8217;ve been pretty happy with it in general. It has been flexible for us, as well as saving us money. For example, we&#8217;ve been able to keep the same phone numbers for several years, even across several moves. When we got to the &#8216;new place,&#8217; we only needed Internet service, and everything was up and running again. It allowed us to capture voice-mail as audio files and e-mail them to members of the family. We&#8217;ve been getting our calls for around $0.019 per minute or less (sometimes free). About the only down-side is either no-911 service or e911 service, but we always have a cell phone or two around for emergency anyway.</p>
<p>I was a little sad to see Gizmo5 go after all these years. Their support was OK. It took a bunch of monkeying around to get it going initially. We have used an ATA hardware device, which allowed normal phones to be plugged in and used. Once setup and configured properly, though, it has been little different than using a traditional phone. We&#8217;ve even been able to have a US and Canada phone number that ring the same phone, which is handy since we now live in Canada but have lots of friends and relatives in the US.</p>
<p>Moving to Google Voice is a WHOLE different story! First, Google seems to have just shut down Gizmo5 support. This is kind of inconsiderate, given that people might need some help with the transition or porting numbers to other services. To make matters worse, it seems Google Voice support is also nearly non-existent. I&#8217;m guessing you can get a kind of &#8216;self-help&#8217; support through their forums, if you can get to them.</p>
<p>First, I had trouble even figuring out what the heck Google Voice is. I have a friend who has used it and told me a bit about it, or I&#8217;d certainly be lost by looking at Google&#8217;s web site. It just seems to be this Internet calling thingy that may or may not be connected to calling phone numbers, etc. They use a lot of terms for the &#8216;features&#8217; that make it sound impressive, but I haven&#8217;t really figured out anything it can do that most VoIP providers do not.</p>
<p>Second, since I&#8217;m in Canada, I couldn&#8217;t even get into the Google Voice forums or create an account to see what the heck was going on. I decided to get a refund on my credits, and attempt a port of one of my numbers, but it was a blind move. No support, and no way I could see to get support. I spent an hour one day just trying to see if I could get into their support (I&#8217;ve got several &#8216;Google Accounts&#8217; now, but all failed). I think they must be blocking by IP. In other words, if you&#8217;re not in the US, you can&#8217;t get anywhere in their support system!</p>
<p>As an aside, if Google support is this horrible (and I&#8217;m not the only one who has complained about it&#8230; Google doesn&#8217;t seem to be known for their customer service), how well does this bode for Android users? Maybe ponder that a bit before you make your decision against getting an iPad or iPhone!</p>
<p>Enter <a title="https://www.callcentric.com/" href="https://www.callcentric.com/" target="_blank">Callcentric</a>! Luckily, I had been experimenting a bit with Callcentric previously on my iPod Touch. I had purchased a Canadian dial-in number for it and was making calls from school and such with it. My experience with them was excellent. Their support was extremely responsive (within minutes sometimes)! Their documentation was very good for setup. Their on-line system for settings, call routing, phone books, reporting, etc. was all excellent! About my only complaint about them, is that their voice-mail system seems a bit outdated, however, it still allows me to route my voice-mail messages to e-mail and deliver them as MP3 files. I&#8217;m happy!</p>
<p>So, I was able to port my Gizmo5 number (Canadian) to Callcentric, and decided it wasn&#8217;t worth my time or money to try and get our US number out. Callcentric was also running a special on US dial-in numbers, so I just picked one of those up. The experience has been very good, other than maybe wasting about 1/2 to 1 day messing with Google Voice and porting the numbers. It only took me a few hours to get everything going and setup on Callcentric. Interestingly, even Callcentric tech support had to come to my rescue on porting the number, as Gizmo5 didn&#8217;t provide me with the docs I needed to authorize the port. Since Callcentric had helped other Gizmo5 people, they were able to point me in the right places to get the info I needed.</p>
<p>So, many thanks to Gizmo5 for getting me into VoIP and years of service. Shame on you Google for doing such a horrible job on the transition and for such cruddy support. And, many thanks to <a title="https://www.callcentric.com/" href="https://www.callcentric.com/" target="_blank">Callcentric</a> for being so supportive in the transition.</p>
<p>Also, if you are wondering why I didn&#8217;t mention <a title="http://www.skype.com/" href="http://www.skype.com/" target="_blank">Skype</a>, it is because Skype doesn&#8217;t offer numbers in Canada. Also, Skype is a proprietary VoIP service which isn&#8217;t based on the SIP standard. You really want to be SIP based if you want to work with regular software VoIP clients, or standard VoIP hardware. I have nothing against Skype, and use it quite a bit, but IMO, it is a different kind of thing. One thing Skype is really good at, is punching its way out of networks to get a call through. I use both SIP clients and Skype on my iPod Touch when mobile. If I can&#8217;t get a call out with the SIP software, I usually can with Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/03/16/farewell-gizmo5-no-thanks-google-voice-hello-callcentric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas mileage conversion chart: Canada &amp; USA</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/02/01/gas-mileage-conversion-chart-canada-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/02/01/gas-mileage-conversion-chart-canada-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas mileage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have yet to get used to thinking in Liters/100km for gas mileage here in Canada. Miles per Gallon (MPG) is simply engrained in my head. Part of the problem is just the difference in units of liters and gallons. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/02/01/gas-mileage-conversion-chart-canada-usa/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 15px 4px 0;">
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 169px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/magnera/3755006104/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2601/3755006104_fb54b57562_m.jpg" alt="Colorful Old Oil Barrels" width="159" height="240" class="alignnone" /></a>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/magnera/3755006104/">Colorful Old Oil Barrels</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/magnera/">L.C.Nøttaasen</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>I have yet to get used to thinking in Liters/100km for gas mileage here in Canada. Miles per Gallon (MPG) is simply engrained in my head. Part of the problem is just the difference in units of liters and gallons. But, there is also the issue of one measuring distance on 1 gallon, while the other is measuring the quantity of fuel over a distance. To top it off, they run inverse of each other. (ex: a car that gets MORE MPG is better, but a car that uses LESS liters/100km is better.) Anyway, it threw my brain for a loop while I was car shopping several months back, so I looked around the Internet for a conversion calculator or chart. I could only find one for UK gallons (which I didn&#8217;t catch for a while, which REALLY confused me for a bit). Calculators weren&#8217;t very convenient while car shopping, so I decided to make a nice chart to take along.<span id="more-104"></span></p>
<p>If you are also struggling with this one way or the other, enjoy!</p>
<div id="attachment_105" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/liters_km_mpg_chart.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-105" title="liters_km_mpg_chart" src="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/liters_km_mpg_chart-300x171.png" alt="Liters/100km to MPG (US) Conversion Chart" width="300" height="171" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Liters/100km to MPG (US) Conversion Chart</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2011/02/01/gas-mileage-conversion-chart-canada-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great OSX Services addition: WordService by Devon Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2010/11/11/great-osx-services-addition-wordservice-by-devon-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2010/11/11/great-osx-services-addition-wordservice-by-devon-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post to point out an update to Devon Technologies&#8217; WordService. WordService has just been updated to version 2.8 if you are already using it. Download at: http://www.devon-technologies.com/download/index.html If you are not already using this, I really recommend &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2010/11/11/great-osx-services-addition-wordservice-by-devon-technologies/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 15px 4px 0;">
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 250px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kessiye/2705422977/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3281/2705422977_c294a15d35_m.jpg" alt="Snow Leopard" width="240" height="180" class="alignnone" /></a>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kessiye/2705422977/">Snow Leopard</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kessiye/">BenedictFrancis</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Just a quick post to point out an update to Devon Technologies&#8217; WordService. WordService has just been updated to version 2.8 if you are already using it. Download at:</p>
<p><a title="http://www.devon-technologies.com/download/index.html" href="http://www.devon-technologies.com/download/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.devon-technologies.com/download/index.html</a></p>
<p>If you are not already using this, I really recommend that you check it out.<span id="more-76"></span> It adds a whole number of quite useful utilities to your Services menu on Mac OSX. From their website:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>WordService</strong> provides 37 functions to convert, format or speak the currently selected text, to insert data or to show statistics of the selection within all Cocoa applications (e.g. Textedit, Pages, Mail, Stickies, Safari or Xcode) and Carbon applications supporting services.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My favorite and most used is &#8216;Reformat&#8217; which does stuff like strip extra spaces, line feeds and other junk out of text. When I copy something from the web or pretty much anywhere, I typically paste it into a blank TextEdit document set to plain-text. I then do a &#8216;select all&#8217; and then &#8216;Reformat&#8217;. It cleans the text up really nice! I also use the insert time/date functions quite a bit. The others are really useful as well, but I don&#8217;t have keys mapped to many others.</p>
<p>To map a keyboard shortcut go to your Services preferences under <em>System Preferences -&gt; Keyboard -&gt; Keyboard Shortcuts -&gt; Services</em>. By the way, the Services settings are a bit tricky until you figure it out. When it says to double-click on the shortcut and then push the key combination to set it, it actually means to double click in the area to the right of the service you want to set the keys for. If you scroll up and down, you should see some, and if you double-click there, you&#8217;ll see how it selects and gets highlighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2010/11/11/great-osx-services-addition-wordservice-by-devon-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiFi scamming&#8230; be careful</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/08/30/wifi-scamming-be-careful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/08/30/wifi-scamming-be-careful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably are aware of this scam concerning wifi, as it is not new. But for OSX users, I just wanted to post a visual of it. I took this screen-shot on a recent trip while I was at the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/08/30/wifi-scamming-be-careful/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image33" src="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/Airport_Scam.png" alt="Airport Scam" /></p>
<p>You probably are aware of this scam concerning wifi, as it is not new. But for OSX users, I just wanted to post a visual of it. I took this screen-shot on a recent trip while I was at the airport. As you can see, you should be looking for a network to join up where it says TELUS. If you look under &#8216;Computer-to-Computer Networks&#8217; you will see &#8216;Free Public WiFi&#8217; and &#8216;tmobile&#8217;. Both of these are scams. They are probably people sitting in the airport with their personal sharing turned on, waiting for someone to connect to the Internet through them. They can then capture packets of data, and look for people logging into services. Many services an average user might connect to are not all that secure (ie: properly encrypted passwords, etc.). They snag this info and then can use it.<span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p>Even if you connect to an actual router&#8230; such as &#8216;TELUS&#8217;, it could still be a scam. However, it is certainly more complicated to to setup that scam. Also, if you are somewhere such as an airport, there are usually advertisements as to what the name of the service is you should be seeing.</p>
<p>Also, just to be safe, whenever you are in a place using a Internet connection other than your own, be aware of what kind of services and things you sign into. The big problem is that many people check their e-mail, which is not a super-secure thing to do. While you can&#8217;t ever make yourself totally safe, you can prevent a lot of problems with just a bit of care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/08/30/wifi-scamming-be-careful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacWorld eve</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/01/09/macworld-eve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/01/09/macworld-eve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I guess it&#8217;s morning officially. In a few hours, Apple will be pulling the covers off whatever they have been teasing us about. The interesting thing is that I&#8217;m really not sure what to expect this year. In years &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/01/09/macworld-eve/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image28" src="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/apple2007.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Apple 2007 teaser" /><br />
Well, I guess it&#8217;s morning officially. In a few hours, Apple will be pulling the covers off whatever they have been teasing us about. The interesting thing is that I&#8217;m really not sure what to expect this year. In years past, I had been waiting on various products to be released&#8230;. especially on the computer front. This year, Apple already has the best computers on the market across the board. There really isn&#8217;t anything for them to do in that category. So, speculation seems to be that most of the announcements will be in the home theatre / phone category. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll also see a bunch of nifty software released, as we usually do at January MacWorld. I&#8217;ll be roving the floor at the show later this week&#8230; maybe I&#8217;ll post some pics from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2007/01/09/macworld-eve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virus protection&#8230; a new approach!</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/11/13/virus-protection-a-new-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/11/13/virus-protection-a-new-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You never can be too safe living in the on-line world of today. If you read the &#8216;tech&#8217; web sites, you are assured to find some article about a new exploit endangering your cyber existence. Even if you don&#8217;t follow &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/11/13/virus-protection-a-new-approach/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never can be too safe living in the on-line world of today. If you read the &#8216;tech&#8217; web sites, you are assured to find some article about a new exploit endangering your cyber existence. Even if you don&#8217;t follow the tech news, you would pretty much have to live in isolation of the media in order to be unaware of the dangers of the wiley wide web.</p>
<p>Heck, even us Mac users have been perking up and paying attention&#8230; over the last year security firms have found spots in OSX where a skillful hacker *could* potentially have caused us some problems. We&#8217;ve not seen a virus yet, so it&#8217;s not like panic has set in or anything&#8230; but one always has to be on guard. Some Mac users even go so far as to install anti-virus software, just in case!<span id="more-27"></span></p>
<p>But, while I was perusing some of those &#8216;tech&#8217; sites this morning, I ran across a totally new approach. Duh! It seems M$&#8217;s Windows co-president, Jim Allchin, found a MUCH more simple way to avoid all these problems.</p>
<p>WARNING: Don&#8217;t read further if you are not sitting down&#8230;.</p>
<p>It seems that Jim has actually unleashed his 7-year-old son&#8230;. to surf the net&#8230;. on a Windows machine&#8230;. WITHOUT anti-virus software! GASP!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; if you&#8217;re still with me&#8230; before you go into a state of shock, read on&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193700656">http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193700656</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Honestly, he doesn&#8217;t have an antivirus system on his machine. His machine is locked down with parental controls, he can&#8217;t download things unless it&#8217;s to the places that I&#8217;ve said that he could do, and I&#8217;m feeling totally confident about that,&#8221; Allchin said. &#8220;That is quite a statement. I couldn&#8217;t say that in Windows XP SP2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Man, I can&#8217;t believe I didn&#8217;t think of that. All you have to do is lock down your computer with parental controls, so you can only go to a few known good web locations&#8230;. and you&#8217;re safe. How amazing is that?! Maybe he should patent the idea.</p>
<p>However, what I find even more amazing is that last sentence. Apparently, to get this safety, you&#8217;ll have to buy Vista (oh, and probably a new computer which can run Vista). I guess previous versions of Windows can catch a virus just by thinking about the Internet.</p>
<p>Well folks&#8230; there you have it. A simple solution from the great minds at M$. All you have to do is give them a couple hundred bucks&#8230;. buy a new computer&#8230; and lock down your parental controls for a 7-year-old&#8230; and you&#8217;re safe.</p>
<p>Oh, I guess the only thing I need to figure out now is how you determine the &#8216;safe list&#8217; of web sites. Maybe Jim will be distributing this? Or, I guess you can call one of your friends with Mac.</p>
<p>But Jim, I have an even more simple solution&#8230;. why not just get a Mac and save yourself several hundred $.</p>
<p>(OK&#8230; I promise to write about something besides picking on M$ soon. But, they just make it so easy&#8230; &#8216;like shooting fish in a barrel&#8217; I think the saying goes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/11/13/virus-protection-a-new-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs &#8211; top 10 greatest IT people&#8230;. where am I?</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/10/30/steve-jobs-top-10-greatest-it-people-where-am-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/10/30/steve-jobs-top-10-greatest-it-people-where-am-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ComputerWeekly just named Steve Jobs the greatest IT person of all times. He even beat out Bill Gates, who came in 3rd. Many will think this is just silly, but really&#8230; read the article. I think it is a well &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/10/30/steve-jobs-top-10-greatest-it-people-where-am-i/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ComputerWeekly just named Steve Jobs the greatest IT person of all times. He even beat out Bill Gates, who came in 3rd. Many will think this is just silly, but really&#8230; read the article. I think it is a well deserved honor. While he had a LOT of help&#8230; without his vision and drive, much of what we now know in the the IT world would not exist, or probably be greatly delayed.<span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2006/10/27/219459/IT+greats+Top+10+greatest+IT+people.htm">ComputerWeekly article</a></p>
<p>My only question&#8230; where is my name? <img src='http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/10/30/steve-jobs-top-10-greatest-it-people-where-am-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally&#8230; some sanity on Apple security</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/09/19/finally-some-sanity-on-apple-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/09/19/finally-some-sanity-on-apple-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just ran across this article on Apple&#8217;s security problems. From the press lately, you&#8217;d think the sky was falling. Thankfully, John Welch has written this excellent article on what this really means, and some tips to help protect yourself. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/09/19/finally-some-sanity-on-apple-security/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across this article on Apple&#8217;s security problems. From the press lately, you&#8217;d think the sky was falling. Thankfully, John Welch has written this excellent article on what this really means, and some tips to help protect yourself. To sum it up, no, the sky isn&#8217;t falling chicken little. I especially liked the idiots who added a 3rd party wifi card to a MacBook, and then hacked it (so that makes what? one MacBook like this in the entire universe?&#8230; what dorks.)<span id="more-25"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193001536">http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193001536</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/09/19/finally-some-sanity-on-apple-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple laptops might get hot&#8230;. but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/06/24/apple-laptops-might-get-hot-but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/06/24/apple-laptops-might-get-hot-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tid-Bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, I was a bit bummed about some issues Apple has been experiencing with their new MacBook Pro and MacBook models. It turns out that some manufacturing problems have lead to CPUs running hot (due to thermal paste application &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/06/24/apple-laptops-might-get-hot-but/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, I was a bit bummed about some issues Apple has been experiencing with their new MacBook Pro and MacBook models. It turns out that some manufacturing problems have lead to CPUs running hot (due to thermal paste application issues), and some problems with fan bearings. In one case, some plastic was left covering the back vents.</p>
<p>It became personal when I ran into the fan issue on the MacBook Pro that was issued to me at my job (YAY!). I ended up having to take it into the Apple Store to be repaired, and am currently awaiting its return. It&#8217;s not a big issue, mind you. Though, any day away from a new Mac can be quite traumatic (as any Mac user can attest).<span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>However, I found that things could certainly be a lot worse. Sure, Apple has a problem now and then, but they are generally very good about fixing problems. And even with the problems, their products are still on par, or superior in quality to just about anything else on the market.</p>
<p>Case in point&#8230; I wonder how much press Dell will get compared to Apple on this one?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.theinquirer.net/images/articles/dell%20banger1.jpg" alt="Flaming Dell" /></p>
<p>This photo is from the following article:<br />
<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550</a></p>
<p>The laptop was apparently set up at a conference table, when it &#8216;exploded&#8217; into flames. Good thing it wasn&#8217;t on someone&#8217;s lap. Think about that the next time you&#8217;re sitting on the couch surfing the web! Yikes!</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m certainly not saying that non-Apple laptops explode or burst in flames on a regular basis (not counting the Windows OS in a figurative sense, which happens VERY often). But, the types of issues Apple users tend to see are not uncommon at all with other higher end vendors, and very mild compared to the lower priced brands PC users are quick to refer to when comparing to Apple.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll not complain too much about a bit of bearing noise in a fan&#8230; and a week away from the new little Mac&#8230; sniff, sniff. And even though Apple is getting quite a bit of press on &#8216;issues&#8217; with their new laptop line&#8230; we just have to put it all into perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cgwerks.com/steveblog/2006/06/24/apple-laptops-might-get-hot-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

